⩖ powrelay.xyz

0.17.1 wisp mining test

https://nostrcheck.girino.org/media/d856658b51455cabe673348fa99711a27e14121e9af67e68f3d9cd076ad45769.jpeg Collectivism isn’t just a left-wing problem. It’s any ideology that treats groups as more real than individuals, that judges you by tribe, class, or ancestry instead of choice and achievement. On the left, it shows up as class warfare and identity politics. On the right, as nationalism and tribalism. All of them deny that individuals think and act for themselves. They claim your character is set by your group, erasing the line between earned achievement and inherited status. Ayn Rand called racism “the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism” for that reason. Collectivism denies your mind, your reason, your freedom to choose. It rejects what makes us human. America was founded on the opposite idea: that rights belong to individuals, not to tribes, races, or classes. That is what made it unique. Not democracy, the Greeks had that. Not republicanism, the Romans had that. But a nation built on individual rights, not tribal belonging. And that doesn’t erase culture. It creates it. When millions freely choose to read Shakespeare, build with Edison’s inventions, or adopt constitutional principles, that is culture: living, evolving, chosen. Free societies thrive because they let individuals create and others freely adopt what works. Tribal societies stagnate because they force people to repeat what ancestors did. Capitalism made this principle real. In a free market, nobody cares about your ancestry, only about the value you create. The freest economies are the least tribal. The most controlled are the most collectivist. Soviet Russia had class-based oppression. Nazi Germany had race-based oppression. Both rejected individualism. Both were collectivist. So when someone defends the West while judging by ethnicity or religion, they have already abandoned its core. You cannot defend free markets while embracing racism. You cannot oppose socialism while supporting tribalism. The question is simple. Do individuals have rights or do groups? Are you judged by your choices or by your DNA? History’s verdict is clear. Tribal societies breed war and stagnation. Individualist ones produce peace and progress. To defend Western civilization is to defend individual rights against the woke left, the socialists, the nationalists, and anyone who judges by group rather than character. The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Abandon that, and you abandon freedom itself. The real battle is not left versus right. It is individualism versus collectivism. And only one of them built civilization. Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1293786466113944

Start9 is a really interesting option on the new update, since users can provision Tor interfaces for each specific endpoint that an app has listed.

Yes probably with multiaccount #simplex sets the best example of how it should be done.

There's a hum from 3 gammas and the 2 fans but my wife turns on a sound machine to sleep that's WAY louder. I don't have a db meter but it's not bad.

You can't take him with the other dogs? What about getting a second mutt to keep him company? Finally, a kennel in the yard. Hell get used to it eventually?

clawbot can fix aws? #asknostr

https://blossom-espelhator.girino.org/054d3d4af7984e220ce359da5309600cdd47adc97291aef50ae94c351b1d8539.jpg Has Rowan Atkinson nailed it on the head about free speech and religion? He makes a clear distinction between attacking someone for who they are — such as their race — and criticising ideas, including religious beliefs. In his view, race is not up for debate, but religion, like any set of ideas, must be open to question. He argues that in a free society, people should be able to challenge, debate and even ridicule beliefs — including religious ones — without certain ideas being placed beyond scrutiny. Atkinson suggests that the growing notion of a “right not to be offended” risks limiting open discussion. For him, the freedom to criticise religion and other ideas — even if it causes offence — is fundamental to openness, while shielding beliefs from criticism edges towards oppression. Whether you agree or not, it’s a strong defence of the principle that ideas, including religious ideas, should always be open to challenge. Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1255520176686838

I had considered previously that he was actually working on a genius plan to to sabotage the petrodollar and bring in hyperbitcoinization. But I don't think that's the case. He hates looking bad. I don't think he could play this role for this long without snapping.

Where can I bet 100ksats that this is gonna end badly, Iran is gonna hit back real hard and stocks are gonna go red by Thursday. nostr:nevent1qqsg685hv7wlyqqpd4fzr9e4msn9y2e9tdnh9jcnl2djhucuma09stqpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2uczyzzmmdv8tcgnmnyefx95w33kgjvg9ms458rcz49tqlqxtdrn88t8y7g207z